For now, however, the numbers present a clear picture: domestic generation is comfortably covering demand, private producers have become the backbone of supply, and nearly 30 percent of the electricity available in the system is finding a market beyond Nepal’s borders.

Kathmandu — Nepal’s electricity system has recorded a strong surplus position, with domestic generation sufficient to meet national consumption while allowing more than 22,000 megawatt-hours of electricity to be exported, according to figures released by the Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA).
The total volume of electricity handled in the system stood at 73,629 megawatt-hours (MWh). Of this, 51,527 MWh was consumed within the country, while 22,102 MWh was exported.
The figures mean that roughly 70 percent of the available electricity was used domestically, while about 30 percent was exported. In other words, nearly three out of every 10 units of electricity available in the system were sold outside the country.
What makes the figures more notable is the absence of electricity imports. The NEA reported no power imports from India during the period, indicating that domestic generation was sufficient not only to cover local consumption but also to create a sizeable exportable surplus.
The export volume was equivalent to about 43 percent of domestic electricity consumption. This shows that Nepal’s surplus during the period was substantial rather than marginal.
Private power producers emerged as the largest source of electricity in the system, supplying 47,563 MWh.
That represents about 64.6 percent of total electricity generation based on the figures provided.
NEA subsidiary companies supplied another 17,108 MWh, accounting for approximately 23.2 percent, while projects directly owned by the authority contributed 8,959 MWh, or about 12.2 percent.
The numbers underline the increasingly dominant role of independent power producers in Nepal’s electricity sector.
For every unit generated directly by NEA-owned projects, private producers supplied more than five units during the period.
This shift is significant because Nepal’s electricity system was historically centred on projects developed and operated by the state utility. The latest generation mix suggests that private investment has become the main engine of additional electricity supply.
There is, however, a minor numerical inconsistency in the figures provided.
The electricity supplied by private producers, NEA subsidiaries and the authority’s own projects adds up to 73,630 MWh, while total electricity availability is reported at 73,629 MWh.
The difference is only 1 MWh and may reflect rounding, reporting adjustments or a minor data-entry variation. It does not materially change the overall picture, but it is worth noting when interpreting the figures.
By contrast, domestic consumption of 51,527 MWh and exports of 22,102 MWh add up exactly to the reported total of 73,629 MWh.
Nepal’s evening peak electricity demand reached 3,248 megawatts.
The distinction between the peak-demand figure and the daily energy figures is important. Megawatts measure the amount of power required at a particular moment, while megawatt-hours measure the volume of energy consumed or generated over a period.
The 3,248 MW peak therefore indicates the highest pressure placed on the power system during the evening, when household, commercial and industrial consumption tends to rise simultaneously.
Managing peak demand remains more challenging than simply producing sufficient total energy because generation and transmission capacity must be available at the exact time demand reaches its highest point.
The absence of imports and the sizeable export volume also reflect Nepal’s seasonal electricity pattern.
Hydropower dominates the country’s generation mix, meaning electricity production generally rises during the rainy season as river flows increase.
During periods of strong hydrological conditions, generation can exceed domestic requirements, creating room for exports.
This is almost the opposite of Nepal’s traditional dry-season challenge, when reduced river flows can lower hydropower output and increase pressure on the domestic system.
The current numbers therefore illustrate both the progress and the structural challenge of Nepal’s power sector: the country can produce a large surplus during favourable hydrological periods, but maintaining the same balance throughout the year requires greater storage capacity, stronger transmission infrastructure and a more diversified generation mix.
The export of 22,102 MWh also highlights the growing economic role of cross-border electricity trade.
Surplus electricity has limited value if it cannot be consumed domestically or sold abroad at the time it is generated. Hydropower plants cannot simply store all unused electricity for later use unless they are supported by reservoir or storage systems.
Cross-border trade therefore gives Nepal an outlet for surplus wet-season power that might otherwise be curtailed.
Electricity exports can also generate foreign currency earnings while improving the financial utilisation of hydropower projects.
But the long-term benefit will depend on Nepal’s ability to secure reliable export markets, strengthen cross-border transmission lines and negotiate commercially favourable arrangements.
The NEA said electricity supply had not faced major disruption anywhere in the country despite ongoing rainfall.
Heavy rains can pose risks to distribution networks through landslides, floods, falling trees, damaged poles and transmission faults.
To respond to possible disruptions, the authority has kept technical and maintenance teams on standby across all seven provincial offices as well as in Kathmandu.
The arrangement is intended to allow repair teams to be mobilised quickly if faults occur.
Maintaining uninterrupted supply during the monsoon is particularly important because high hydropower generation does not automatically guarantee reliable electricity delivery. Power plants may produce sufficient electricity, but failures in transmission or distribution networks can still interrupt supply to consumers.
The latest figures illustrate how dramatically Nepal’s electricity sector has changed.
The country once depended heavily on imported electricity and faced prolonged power shortages. The present data show a system capable, at least during favourable generation periods, of meeting its own requirements without imports and exporting a significant share of available electricity.
But the figures also reveal the next challenge.
Nepal must turn seasonal electricity surpluses into a more stable year-round advantage. That will require additional storage hydropower, transmission expansion, stronger domestic industrial demand and reliable regional electricity markets.
For now, however, the numbers present a clear picture: domestic generation is comfortably covering demand, private producers have become the backbone of supply, and nearly 30 percent of the electricity available in the system is finding a market beyond Nepal’s borders.
Written by
Dipesh Ghimire
