Turnover falls to Rs 4.42 billion as the benchmark index struggles to sustain gains above the psychologically important 2,700-point level

Kathmandu: Nepal’s stock market extended its decline for a second consecutive session on Tuesday, although the fall was considerably smaller than the previous day’s loss. The Nepal Stock Exchange index dropped by 4.64 points to close at 2,696.67, reflecting continued caution among investors as the market remained trapped between a major technical support level and resistance around 2,700 points.
The benchmark index had fallen by 33.28 points on Monday. Compared with that sharp correction, Tuesday’s movement appeared relatively stable. However, the market’s inability to recover from the previous session’s decline indicates that buyers are not yet confident enough to take aggressive positions.
Trading activity also weakened during the session. A total of 10,421,863 shares of 342 companies were traded through the exchange, generating a turnover of more than Rs 4.42 billion. The decline in transaction value suggests that a section of investors has adopted a wait-and-see approach rather than actively accumulating or disposing of shares.
The combination of a small decline in the index and lower turnover provides a mixed signal. On the one hand, the fall in trading volume indicates that selling pressure was not particularly aggressive. On the other hand, reduced participation also shows that buyers lacked the conviction required to push the market decisively higher.
Market breadth remained negative. Share prices of 98 companies increased, while 166 companies recorded losses. Prices of 13 companies remained unchanged. The substantially higher number of declining companies shows that weakness was more widespread than the modest fall in the benchmark index might initially suggest.
The Sensitive Index, Float Index and Sensitive Float Index also ended slightly lower. The decline in these indicators suggests that the weakness was not limited to smaller speculative companies. Large-capitalisation and actively traded companies also faced insufficient buying support.
The performance of sectoral indices remained uneven. Of the 13 subgroups traded on Tuesday, only four closed higher. The finance, hotels and tourism, hydropower and trading subgroups registered gains, while the remaining nine sectors ended in negative territory.
The sectoral movement shows that investor interest was concentrated in selected areas instead of spreading across the broader market. A sustainable market rally usually requires participation from major sectors, particularly commercial banks and other companies with significant weight in the index. Their weaker performance prevented the NEPSE from maintaining its early gains.
The rise in finance and hydropower shares may also reflect the continued preference of short-term traders for relatively volatile sectors. Such selective activity can produce strong movements in individual companies without creating enough momentum to lift the overall market.
Everest Colour Limited was the strongest-performing company of the session, with its share price reaching the upper circuit level. The company’s price increased by Rs 112.30 to close at Rs 861 per share. The sharp rise, despite the broader market weakness, indicates strong demand concentrated in the company’s shares.
At the opposite end, Kutheli Bukhari Small Hydropower recorded the largest loss of the day. Its share price declined by 6.07 per cent. The difference between the best- and worst-performing companies demonstrates that investors are responding to company-specific demand, supply and expectations rather than following a uniform market direction.
Central Finance recorded the highest turnover of the session, with shares worth more than Rs 271.4 million changing hands. Ridi Power and Solu Hydropower followed in terms of transaction value.
The concentration of turnover in a small number of finance and hydropower companies suggests that a considerable portion of daily liquidity was directed towards selected counters. Although high turnover can indicate strong investor interest, it does not automatically mean that shares are being accumulated for the long term. Heavy trading may also result from short-term speculation and rapid buying and selling.
The market opened slightly higher on Tuesday, creating a small upward price gap from the previous closing level. However, the gap was filled within the first minute of trading, showing that the positive opening was not supported by sustained demand.
After losing its initial advantage, the index repeatedly moved around the 2,700-point area. The market tested this level several times during the session but failed to remain convincingly above it.
The 2,700-point level has emerged as an important psychological threshold. Investors often pay close attention to round-number levels because they influence trading expectations and the placement of buy and sell orders. Repeated failure to remain above 2,700 suggests that shareholders are using rallies near this point to sell or reduce their positions.
For the market to regain upward momentum, it would need to cross the 2,700 level with stronger turnover and broader participation from major sectors. A temporary movement above the level would carry limited significance unless the index can also close above it and maintain that position in subsequent sessions.
The market remained relatively stable for much of Tuesday’s session, but selling pressure increased towards the end of trading. The decline became more visible from around 1:54 pm, after which the index moved lower alongside increased transaction activity.
The pattern of weakness after 2 pm has appeared repeatedly in recent sessions. This suggests that some investors are unwilling to carry positions into the next trading day and are choosing to sell during the final hour.
Late-session declines are particularly important because they provide an indication of how investors are positioning themselves before the market closes. When an index fails to hold intraday gains and ends near its lower level of the session, it generally reflects stronger control by sellers during the closing period.
However, the decline was not severe enough to indicate panic selling. The limited fall in the index and reduced overall turnover suggest controlled profit-booking and cautious position adjustment rather than a broad exit from the market.
From a technical perspective, the NEPSE is once again trading near its 200-day moving average. The 200-day moving average, commonly known as the 200 MA, is calculated from the average closing value of the index over the previous 200 trading sessions.
Technical analysts use this indicator to assess the market’s longer-term direction. When an index remains above the 200-day average, the broader trend is generally considered relatively positive. When it falls and remains below the indicator, it can signal weakening momentum and a possible change in the long-term trend.
Technical analyst Ajit Khanal observed that the market has so far respected the 200-day moving average as a support area. Each time the index has approached the level, buying interest has emerged sufficiently to prevent a major breakdown.
Nevertheless, the response from the support level has not been strong enough to generate a decisive upward move. This indicates that buyers are present near the 200-day average, but their strength remains limited.
The index is therefore positioned at a technically sensitive point. Holding above the 200-day moving average could preserve expectations of a market recovery. A clear break below the level, particularly if supported by higher turnover, could weaken investor sentiment and encourage additional selling.
A single intraday movement below the 200-day average would not necessarily confirm a bearish trend. Market participants would generally look for repeated closing levels below the indicator before concluding that the support has failed.
Recent charts have shown the formation of relatively narrow-range candles following the market’s earlier rise. Such candles are formed when the difference between the opening and closing levels, or between the session’s high and low points, remains limited.
This pattern usually reflects indecision. Buyers are unwilling to purchase aggressively at higher prices, while sellers are also reluctant to dispose of shares near an important support area.
Sideways consolidation after a market rise can have two different interpretations. It may provide the market with an opportunity to absorb earlier gains before beginning another upward movement. Alternatively, it may represent weakening momentum before a decline.
The direction of the next major movement will depend largely on whether the index breaks above resistance or below support. A breakout above 2,700 with higher turnover would strengthen the positive interpretation. A breakdown below the 200-day moving average would support the negative scenario.
The decline in turnover makes the current consolidation less convincing from a bullish perspective. Strong rallies are generally supported by expanding transaction value, as rising participation demonstrates broader investor confidence. In the present situation, the market is attempting to stabilise without a clear increase in demand.
Despite the decline in total turnover, transaction data from the 10 largest brokers offered a somewhat positive indication. Seven of the 10 major brokers reportedly recorded higher purchases than sales during the session.
The figures suggest that some large market participants may be accumulating shares while the index remains near its technical support area. This could help explain why the market has not experienced a deeper decline despite negative breadth and weakness in several sectors.
However, broker-level purchase figures must be interpreted carefully. A higher overall purchase amount does not necessarily mean that large investors expect an immediate market rally. The purchases may be concentrated in a limited number of companies, or they may represent short-term trading positions.
The influence of those purchases on the benchmark index also depends on the size and market weight of the companies involved. Buying in small-capitalisation companies may generate strong price movements in individual shares without significantly affecting the overall NEPSE index.
For a more reliable positive signal, broker accumulation would need to be accompanied by increased turnover, wider market participation and stronger performance from companies with high market capitalisation.
The NEPSE is currently moving within a narrow but important technical zone. The 200-day moving average is acting as support on the lower side, while the 2,700-point area is limiting gains on the upper side.
This structure explains why the market has recently displayed uncertain and sideways behaviour. Investors buying near the support level are preventing a sharp decline, while those selling near 2,700 are restricting the market’s ability to advance.
The immediate outlook will largely depend on which of these levels is broken first. A firm close above 2,700, supported by higher turnover and gains across major sectors, could improve market sentiment and create room for further recovery.
In contrast, a sustained close below the 200-day moving average could encourage technical traders to reduce their positions. That could increase supply and expose the index to lower support areas.
The number of declining companies, weak closing-hour performance and falling turnover currently favour a cautious interpretation. At the same time, buying by several large brokers and the continued defence of the 200-day average indicate that the market has not yet entered a clearly bearish phase.
Overall, Tuesday’s session reflected hesitation rather than a decisive change in direction. Investors appear to be waiting for stronger confirmation before making major decisions. The index’s behaviour around 2,700, its ability to hold the 200-day moving average and changes in turnover over the next few sessions will be crucial in determining the market’s short-term course.
Written by
Dipesh Ghimire
