Top
·

By Dipesh Ghimire

Finance Ministry Sets Three-Year Limit on Multi-Year Project Funding Commitments

Finance Ministry Sets Three-Year Limit on Multi-Year Project Funding Commitments

The Ministry of Finance, Nepal has introduced a new policy limiting the funding approval period for multi-year projects to a maximum of three fiscal years. By issuing the “Multi-Year Project Standards, 2082,” the ministry has sought to bring greater discipline and predictability to public investment management.

According to the new standards, funding commitments for multi-year projects will generally remain valid for up to three financial years. However, exceptions have been made for national pride projects and large-scale infrastructure initiatives whose contract periods exceed three years. In such cases, funding approval may be extended in line with project requirements and cost structures.

The ministry has also made it clear that funding approvals will automatically become inactive if procurement processes are not initiated within the same fiscal year in which approval is granted. Officials say this provision aims to discourage delays and prevent projects from remaining inactive despite having secured budgetary commitments.

Under the new framework, a multi-year project is defined as a set of activities with clear objectives, timelines, budgets, and cost estimates. These projects may include national pride projects as well as other long-term development initiatives. Funding approval will be provided by the concerned ministry or agency based on recommendations from the National Planning Commission, Nepal.

To obtain funding approval, ministries and agencies must submit detailed proposals to the commission. These proposals must include project descriptions, cost estimates, budget sub-headings, preliminary and detailed feasibility reports, approved procurement plans, and other relevant documents. Authorities say this requirement is intended to improve transparency and strengthen project evaluation.

The standards specify that only projects with a total cost exceeding NPR 500 million, or government building and service procurement projects exceeding NPR 200 million, will fall under the multi-year funding approval system. Smaller projects will continue to be managed under regular annual budgeting procedures.

Once funding approval is granted, the responsibility for implementation will lie with the respective ministry or agency. These bodies must ensure that resources are allocated within annual budget ceilings and incorporated into the medium-term expenditure framework. In addition, project progress and cost assessments will be regularly updated by both the commission and the finance ministry.

The policy also prioritizes continuity in public spending. When proposing new projects, agencies must first ensure that sufficient budget has been allocated to previously approved multi-year projects. Only after meeting these obligations can they request funding approval for new high-priority initiatives. This provision aims to reduce the growing number of partially completed projects.

For projects financed through foreign assistance, the rules are relatively flexible. If projects are implemented within the limits specified in donor agreements and the government’s counterpart funding obligations, separate funding approval for multi-year procurement will not be required. However, the government’s share must still be included in the medium-term expenditure framework.

The ministry has announced that during the current fiscal year 2082/83, it will focus on streamlining proposal submission, approval, and implementation processes. Officials say this is part of a broader effort to improve coordination among ministries and reduce procedural delays in project execution.

Special provisions have been made for national pride projects, which will be eligible for funding approval throughout their implementation period. Other multi-year projects must have a minimum duration of more than one fiscal year to qualify. Policymakers believe this distinction will help prioritize strategically important infrastructure and development works.

Economists and policy analysts view the new standards as an attempt to address long-standing weaknesses in Nepal’s public investment system. In the past, many projects suffered from funding uncertainty, repeated extensions, and poor coordination, leading to cost overruns and delayed completion.

By limiting approval periods and linking them to performance and procurement timelines, the government hopes to improve accountability and ensure more efficient use of public resources. However, experts caution that effective implementation will be crucial. Without strong monitoring and institutional capacity, even well-designed rules may fail to deliver results.

Overall, the new three-year funding approval framework reflects the government’s effort to bring greater clarity, discipline, and sustainability to multi-year development projects. As Nepal continues to invest heavily in infrastructure and public services, the success of this policy will play a key role in shaping future growth and fiscal stability.

Related Blogs

High-Level Panel Urges Capital Expansion and Structural Reform for Nepal Stock Exchange
Top

4 min read

High-Level Panel Urges Capital Expansion and Structural Reform for Nepal Stock Exchange

High-Level Panel Urges Capital Expansion and Structural Reform for Nepal Stock Exchange A high-level committee formed to restructure the Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE) has concluded that increasing the exchange’s paid-up capital is essential for its long-term sustainability and competitiveness. The 126-page report, prepared under the coordination of former Nepal Accounting Board chairperson Prakash Jung Thapa, was made public by the Ministry of Finance, Nepal on Tuesday. The report states that although the Securities Market Operation Regulation, 2007 requires a minimum paid-up capital of NPR 3 billion for a secondary market operator, NEPSE is currently operating with only NPR 1 billion. According to the committee, this gap has limited the exchange’s ability to modernize its services and compete with regional and international markets. The committee has warned that without sufficient capital, NEPSE cannot make the necessary investments in technology, human resources, infrastructure, research, and service expansion. To address this, it has recommended issuing bonus shares to immediately raise paid-up capital to NPR 3 billion. If additional funding is required in the future, the report suggests mobilizing resources through rights shares or fresh public offerings. Analysts believe this recommendation reflects growing concern over NEPSE’s weakening institutional capacity. In recent years, the exchange has struggled to keep pace with technological change, while neighboring markets have invested heavily in automation, surveillance, and data systems. As a result, Nepal’s capital market has remained relatively small and less attractive to foreign investors. The report has also highlighted weaknesses in NEPSE’s ownership and governance structure. At present, the Government of Nepal holds 58.66 percent ownership, while the remaining shares are held by public and financial institutions. The committee argues that this structure has reinforced bureaucratic control and limited managerial flexibility. To address this, the panel has proposed partial divestment and the introduction of strategic partners. However, it has ruled out full privatization, warning that complete government withdrawal could weaken small investors’ confidence, increase the risk of monopoly, and undermine market self-regulation. Instead, it recommends maintaining partial state ownership while gradually reducing government stakes. Under the proposed model, strategic partners may be allowed to hold between 15 and 25 percent ownership, with a mandatory lock-in period of at least ten years. The report states that such partners should be selected from leading global stock exchanges with at least 20 years of experience and membership in the World Federation of Exchanges (WFE).

Dipesh Ghimire

·

4 Feb, 2026

Nepal Strengthens Cyber Defenses as Digital Banking Risks Continue to Rise
Top

3 min read

Nepal Strengthens Cyber Defenses as Digital Banking Risks Continue to Rise

Nepal Strengthens Cyber Defenses as Digital Banking Risks Continue to Rise As Nepal’s digital financial ecosystem expands rapidly, concerns over cyber threats and data security are becoming increasingly prominent. Against this backdrop, the Nepal Bankers Association (NBA), in collaboration with Visa, organized a national-level workshop in Kathmandu aimed at strengthening the country’s cyber resilience. The event, titled “Strengthening Cybersecurity Resilience in Nepal,” was held on Magh 14 and brought together key stakeholders from across the financial and security sectors. The workshop was organized at a time when digital payments, mobile banking, and online transactions are growing at an unprecedented pace. While these developments have improved financial access and efficiency, they have also increased Nepal’s exposure to cyber fraud, data breaches, and digital crimes. Organizers said the program was designed to help institutions better understand emerging threats and improve their preparedness. High-level representatives from government agencies, regulatory bodies, security institutions, banks, financial companies, and international development partners participated in the event. According to the organizers, this broad participation reflected a shared recognition that cybersecurity is no longer a technical issue alone but a national priority linked to economic stability and public trust. The inaugural session was attended by officials from the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, the cyber security directorate of the Nepal Army, Nepal Rastra Bank, and the International Finance Corporation (IFC). Their presence highlighted the growing importance of inter-agency coordination in protecting Nepal’s digital economy.

Dipesh Ghimire

·

4 Feb, 2026