Top
·

By Dipesh Ghimire

Microfinance Sector Records Sharp Profit Growth in Second Quarter of FY 2082/83

Microfinance Sector Records Sharp Profit Growth in Second Quarter of FY 2082/83

Nepal’s microfinance sector has posted a strong financial recovery in the second quarter of the current fiscal year 2082/83, with overall net profit rising by 73.17 percent compared to the same period last year. Improved loan quality, higher interest income, and supportive monetary policies have helped strengthen earnings across most institutions, signaling renewed stability in the sector.

According to financial statements up to the end of Poush, microfinance institutions earned a combined net profit of Rs 4.79 billion this year, up from Rs 2.76 billion in the corresponding period of the previous fiscal year. The sharp increase reflects a turnaround from last year’s sluggish performance, when rising bad loans and liquidity constraints had weighed heavily on profitability.

Analysts attribute the improvement mainly to better control over non-performing loans and increased lending activities. In addition, policy measures introduced by Nepal Rastra Bank have helped ease refinancing pressures and improve cash flow in the microfinance industry. As a result, institutions have been able to strengthen their balance sheets and focus on expanding operations.

The number of loss-making microfinance companies has also declined. While eight institutions were in loss until the second quarter of last year, this figure has now fallen to four. This indicates that weaker players have gradually recovered or reduced their financial stress through restructuring and improved management.

Among the major performers, Chhimek Laghubitta recorded a net profit of Rs 576 million, registering a growth of 12.55 percent. Deprosc Laghubitta earned Rs 442.9 million, reflecting an impressive 80.30 percent increase. Similarly, Jeevan Bikas Laghubitta posted a profit of Rs 389 million, marking a rise of 89.37 percent.

Several smaller institutions reported extraordinary growth rates. Forward Microfinance recorded profit growth of more than 2,000 percent, while Abhiyan Laghubitta saw its earnings surge by over 1,900 percent. Other institutions such as Manushi Laghubitta, Mahuli Laghubitta, and Dhaulagiri Laghubitta also reported profit growth exceeding 100 percent.

These sharp increases are largely attributed to low base effects from the previous year, when many institutions had suffered heavy losses. Improved loan recovery, tighter credit monitoring, and expansion in rural lending have helped boost earnings in the current period.

However, not all microfinance companies benefited from the recovery. Ten institutions reported declining profits during the review period. Vijaya Laghubitta recorded the steepest fall, with its net profit declining by 78.56 percent. Analysts say such declines are mainly linked to weak loan portfolios, higher operating costs, and slower business expansion in certain regions.

Overall, out of 50 microfinance institutions operating in Nepal, 40 recorded profit growth compared to last year, while only 10 saw their earnings decline. This broad-based improvement suggests that the sector is gradually regaining strength after facing prolonged pressure from economic slowdown and credit risks.

Experts note that the current performance reflects a combination of internal reforms and external support. Better risk management practices, digitalization of services, and closer regulatory supervision have contributed to improved efficiency. At the same time, stable interest rates and refinancing facilities have helped institutions manage liquidity more effectively.

Despite the encouraging results, analysts caution that sustainability remains a key challenge. Rising competition, borrower repayment capacity, and potential economic uncertainties could affect future earnings. They emphasize the need for continued focus on responsible lending, financial inclusion, and governance reforms.

For now, the second-quarter results indicate that Nepal’s microfinance sector is on a recovery path. If the current trend continues, the industry is expected to play a stronger role in supporting small entrepreneurs, rural households, and financial inclusion in the coming years.

Related Blogs

Nepal's Deputy Governor Vacancy Sparks Debate Over Appointment Process
Top

3 min read

Nepal's Deputy Governor Vacancy Sparks Debate Over Appointment Process

Nepal's Deputy Governor Vacancy Sparks Debate Over Appointment Process With the completion of their five-year terms, Deputy Governors Nilam Dhungana Timilsina and Bambahadur Mishra officially vacated their posts on 25th Falgun. This has raised significant curiosity over the future appointment of the next Deputy Governor of Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB), as the government has not yet made a new appointment. A Transition to New Leadership: Who Will Be the Next Deputy Governor? The current vacancy has heightened the anticipation of who will fill the Deputy Governor role. Dhungana and Mishra were appointed to their positions on 27th Falgun 2077 after being recommended by then-Governor Maha Prasad Adhikari. However, as both completed their tenure, it is unclear when the government will move forward with their replacement. Currently, the Deputy Governor position remains vacant, and the government has not yet appointed anyone to the role. The timing of the appointment is particularly sensitive, as the results of the recent election have led to a shift in government leadership. With the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) having won a clear majority and Senior Leader Balen Shah poised to become the next Prime Minister, the appointment of a Deputy Governor may be delayed until the new government assumes power. Will the Current Government or the Incoming Administration Appoint the Deputy Governor?

Dipesh Ghimire

·

11 Mar, 2026