Top
·

By Dipesh Ghimire

System Glitch Turns Into Legal Milestone for Retail Traders in India

System Glitch Turns Into Legal Milestone for Retail Traders in India

By, Rajan Subedi

An unusual trading incident from India’s derivatives market in 2022 has evolved into a landmark legal precedent, reshaping how responsibility is viewed in broker–client relationships. What began as a technical error at a brokerage firm ultimately led to a court ruling that strengthened the rights of retail traders against large financial institutions.

The case revolves around Gajanan Rajguru, a small retail trader whose account held a modest balance of just ₹3,175. Despite the limited funds and the absence of margin or collateral, his trading account was suddenly granted an unusually large exposure limit—nearly ₹40 crore—due to a technical malfunction in the system of Kotak Securities.

According to court records, the trader neither requested nor authorized this limit. The brokerage’s internal system error enabled the limit automatically, and the firm went a step further by allowing futures and options (F&O) trades using that exposure. Market observers noted that permitting such trades without adequate margin runs counter to regulations set by SEBI, India’s securities regulator.

Once the positions were taken, the market initially moved against Rajguru. Within a short span, the trades reflected substantial paper losses, running into tens of crores, with an immediate visible loss of several lakhs. At that stage, legal experts argue, the brokerage would have had no hesitation in holding the trader responsible for the loss, despite the exposure originating from its own system failure.

However, the market soon reversed direction. Within roughly 20 minutes, prices swung sharply in Rajguru’s favor, transforming the risky positions into a massive gain. The total profit touched around ₹175 crore, an amount unimaginable for a trader who had started the session with a few thousand rupees. Sensing the volatility, Rajguru promptly exited all positions and locked in the gains.

The dispute surfaced when the brokerage refused to credit the profit, citing the technical glitch as the reason. The firm argued that since the exposure limit was enabled by mistake, the resulting gains could not be considered valid. This position drew criticism for its apparent inconsistency—profits were rejected, while losses under the same circumstances would have been enforceable.

Rajguru challenged the decision in court, contending that trades executed on the broker’s own platform, under limits provided by the broker, must be treated as legally binding. The court agreed, ruling that a system error on the broker’s side cannot be transferred to the client. If the broker was prepared to enforce losses, it was equally obligated to honor profits.

In its judgment, the court directed Kotak Securities to pay the entire profit amount to the trader. Legal analysts describe the ruling as a turning point, emphasizing that brokers bear full responsibility for their technological infrastructure and internal controls.

Beyond India, the case has drawn attention from traders and regulators in other markets, including Nepal. It underlines the importance of transparency, documentation, and regulatory compliance in modern trading systems. More significantly, it reinforces a core principle of market fairness: a trade cannot be selectively invalidated based on its outcome.

For retail traders, the verdict sends a powerful message—while trading risks remain high, especially in derivatives, the law can offer protection when broker negligence is clearly established.

Related Blogs

Tax Structure Puts Pressure on Life Insurance Sector, Calls Grow for Policy Review
Top

2 min read

Tax Structure Puts Pressure on Life Insurance Sector, Calls Grow for Policy Review

Tax Structure Puts Pressure on Life Insurance Sector, Calls Grow for Policy Review Nepal’s life insurance sector is increasingly feeling the strain of the existing tax framework, with industry stakeholders arguing that the current method of tax calculation does not fully reflect the nature of insurance business. Analysts say a review has become necessary as the system recognizes income but fails to adequately account for payouts made to policyholders, ultimately affecting long-term savings and social protection. Under the prevailing structure, life insurance companies are required to pay a 30 percent corporate income tax on profits at the outset. Premiums collected from policyholders are invested, and the returns generated from those investments are treated as taxable income. However, amounts paid back to insured individuals—either as maturity benefits or claim settlements—are not factored into tax adjustments. In contrast, many developed economies allow such payouts to be offset during tax calculation, reducing the effective tax burden. Because Nepal’s system focuses solely on income recognition, life insurers argue that it places them at a disadvantage. The impact becomes clearer when examining recent figures. Nepal Life Insurance Company, the country’s largest life insurer, paid taxes equivalent to nearly 53 percent of its profit in the fiscal year 2080/81, amounting to Rs 2.56 billion. While the direct tax rate stands at 30 percent, indirect tax effects significantly reduce funds that would otherwise strengthen the life insurance pool.

Dipesh Ghimire

·

24 Jan, 2026

Falling Interest Rates Reshape Nepal’s Insurance Landscape
Top

2 min read

Falling Interest Rates Reshape Nepal’s Insurance Landscape

Falling Interest Rates Reshape Nepal’s Insurance Landscape The relationship between bank interest rates and insurance uptake in Nepal has become increasingly complex, exposing structural tensions within the financial system. As bank deposit rates decline, insurance products often appear more attractive to savers seeking stable returns and long-term security. However, whether insurance companies can consistently meet customer expectations in such an environment has emerged as a central challenge. Insurance companies in Nepal invest a significant portion of their funds in fixed deposits (FDs) with banks and financial institutions. When FD interest rates fall, insurers face pressure on their investment income, directly affecting their ability to offer competitive bonuses and returns to policyholders. This creates a paradox: while lower bank interest rates encourage people to buy insurance, the same rate environment weakens insurers’ earning capacity. The relationship between bank interest rates and insurance uptake in Nepal has become increasingly complex, exposing structural tensions within the financial system. As bank deposit rates decline, insurance products often appear more attractive to savers seeking stable returns and long-term security. However, whether insurance companies can consistently meet customer expectations in such an environment has emerged as a central challenge. Insurance companies in Nepal invest a significant portion of their funds in fixed deposits (FDs) with banks and financial institutions. When FD interest rates fall, insurers face pressure on their investment income, directly affecting their ability to offer competitive bonuses and returns to policyholders. This creates a paradox: while lower bank interest rates encourage people to buy insurance, the same rate environment weakens insurers’ earning capacity.

Dipesh Ghimire

·

24 Jan, 2026

Economic Slowdown Weighs on Nepal’s Insurance Sector Despite Wider Coverage
Top

2 min read

Economic Slowdown Weighs on Nepal’s Insurance Sector Despite Wider Coverage

Economic Slowdown Weighs on Nepal’s Insurance Sector Despite Wider Coverage The ongoing economic slowdown in Nepal has begun to visibly affect the insurance sector, which is closely tied to overall financial activity. One of the most immediate impacts has come from falling interest rates on fixed deposits offered by banks and financial institutions—traditionally the primary source of investment income for insurance companies. As deposit rates decline, insurers are seeing pressure on both their investment returns and overall earnings. Despite ample liquidity in the banking system, confidence in the market remains weak. Financial institutions are struggling to absorb additional deposits, while lending activity has slowed sharply. Although loan interest rates have fallen to single digits and borrowers can access relatively cheap credit for longer periods, demand for loans remains subdued. Analysts attribute this to reduced purchasing power among households and businesses, which has dampened appetite for borrowing and investment. This slowdown has had a knock-on effect across the economy. When credit growth stalls, money circulation in the market weakens, investment in productive sectors declines, and job creation slows. Without new employment and income growth, consumer spending remains restrained—creating a cycle of low demand that affects sectors such as insurance.

Dipesh Ghimire

·

24 Jan, 2026

Insurance Coverage Expands in Nepal, but Policy Surrenders and Non-Renewals Remain a Growing Concern
Top

2 min read

Insurance Coverage Expands in Nepal, but Policy Surrenders and Non-Renewals Remain a Growing Concern

Insurance Coverage Expands in Nepal, but Policy Surrenders and Non-Renewals Remain a Growing Concern Nepal’s insurance sector has expanded steadily in recent years, yet regulators and industry experts warn that the growing tendency of policyholders to surrender policies or avoid renewal could undermine long-term stability. The concern comes at a time when insurance penetration is rising, but still leaves a majority of the population outside the safety net. Currently, 37 insurance companies operate in Nepal across four categories: 14 life insurers, 14 non-life insurers, two reinsurance companies, and seven micro-insurance companies—including three life and four non-life providers. Each category operates under clearly defined mandates set by insurance regulations, with paid-up capital requirements tailored to the nature of their business. Life insurance in Nepal is increasingly viewed as a dual instrument—offering both risk protection and long-term savings—while non-life insurance plays a crucial role in safeguarding property and assets. Reinsurance companies, meanwhile, spread risk by reinsuring both life and non-life policies domestically and internationally, helping stabilize the broader insurance ecosystem. Nepal’s insurance sector has expanded steadily in recent years, yet regulators and industry experts warn that the growing tendency of policyholders to surrender policies or avoid renewal could undermine long-term stability. The concern comes at a time when insurance penetration is rising, but still leaves a majority of the population outside the safety net. Currently, 37 insurance companies operate in Nepal across four categories: 14 life insurers, 14 non-life insurers, two reinsurance companies, and seven micro-insurance companies—including three life and four non-life providers. Each category operates under clearly defined mandates set by insurance regulations, with paid-up capital requirements tailored to the nature of their business. Life insurance in Nepal is increasingly viewed as a dual instrument—offering both risk protection and long-term savings—while non-life insurance plays a crucial role in safeguarding property and assets. Reinsurance companies, meanwhile, spread risk by reinsuring both life and non-life policies domestically and internationally, helping stabilize the broader insurance ecosystem.

Dipesh Ghimire

·

24 Jan, 2026

Nepal’s Economy: Persistent Constraints, Untapped Opportunities
Top

3 min read

Nepal’s Economy: Persistent Constraints, Untapped Opportunities

Nepal’s Economy: Persistent Constraints, Untapped Opportunities Nepal’s economy continues to grapple with deep-rooted structural problems, even as multiple sectors hold significant untapped potential. Economists point out that the most immediate concern remains the government’s chronic failure to increase capital expenditure, which has limited infrastructure expansion and slowed overall economic momentum. Closely linked to this is the reluctance of the private sector to invest in industries, compounded by weak inflows of foreign direct investment (FDI). Another major bottleneck lies in agriculture. While Nepal produces a range of raw agricultural and forest-based products, the absence of grading, packaging, processing, and value addition has prevented these goods from becoming competitive exports. As a result, resources such as medicinal herbs, broom grass, rhododendron, bayberry, and waterfalls with tourism potential remain underutilized, yielding minimal economic return. Nepal’s economy continues to grapple with deep-rooted structural problems, even as multiple sectors hold significant untapped potential. Economists point out that the most immediate concern remains the government’s chronic failure to increase capital expenditure, which has limited infrastructure expansion and slowed overall economic momentum. Closely linked to this is the reluctance of the private sector to invest in industries, compounded by weak inflows of foreign direct investment (FDI). Another major bottleneck lies in agriculture. While Nepal produces a range of raw agricultural and forest-based products, the absence of grading, packaging, processing, and value addition has prevented these goods from becoming competitive exports. As a result, resources such as medicinal herbs, broom grass, rhododendron, bayberry, and waterfalls with tourism potential remain underutilized, yielding minimal economic return.

Dipesh Ghimire

·

24 Jan, 2026

Court Refuses Interim Relief in Pure Energy’s ISIN Case, Flags Need for Full Adjudication
Top

2 min read

Court Refuses Interim Relief in Pure Energy’s ISIN Case, Flags Need for Full Adjudication

Court Refuses Interim Relief in Pure Energy’s ISIN Case, Flags Need for Full Adjudication The dispute over assigning a single International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) to different classes of shares has reached a critical legal juncture, after the High Court Patan declined to issue an interim order sought by Pure Energy Limited. While denying temporary relief, the court has accorded priority to the hearing of the writ petition, underscoring the wider implications of the case for Nepal’s securities market. Pure Energy had approached the court demanding that both promoter and public shares be assigned a single ISIN, arguing that the current practice of separate identifiers was creating unnecessary complications. A joint bench of Justices Suryanath Prakash Adhikari and Narayan Prasad Suvedi ruled that the issue was substantive in nature and required a final determination rather than interim intervention. The dispute over assigning a single International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) to different classes of shares has reached a critical legal juncture, after the High Court Patan declined to issue an interim order sought by Pure Energy Limited. While denying temporary relief, the court has accorded priority to the hearing of the writ petition, underscoring the wider implications of the case for Nepal’s securities market. Pure Energy had approached the court demanding that both promoter and public shares be assigned a single ISIN, arguing that the current practice of separate identifiers was creating unnecessary complications. A joint bench of Justices Suryanath Prakash Adhikari and Narayan Prasad Suvedi ruled that the issue was substantive in nature and required a final determination rather than interim intervention.

Dipesh Ghimire

·

24 Jan, 2026

System Glitch Turns Into Legal Milestone for Retail Traders in India
Top

2 min read

System Glitch Turns Into Legal Milestone for Retail Traders in India

System Glitch Turns Into Legal Milestone for Retail Traders in India An unusual trading incident from India’s derivatives market in 2022 has evolved into a landmark legal precedent, reshaping how responsibility is viewed in broker–client relationships. What began as a technical error at a brokerage firm ultimately led to a court ruling that strengthened the rights of retail traders against large financial institutions. The case revolves around Gajanan Rajguru, a small retail trader whose account held a modest balance of just ₹3,175. Despite the limited funds and the absence of margin or collateral, his trading account was suddenly granted an unusually large exposure limit—nearly ₹40 crore—due to a technical malfunction in the system of Kotak Securities. An unusual trading incident from India’s derivatives market in 2022 has evolved into a landmark legal precedent, reshaping how responsibility is viewed in broker–client relationships. What began as a technical error at a brokerage firm ultimately led to a court ruling that strengthened the rights of retail traders against large financial institutions. The case revolves around Gajanan Rajguru, a small retail trader whose account held a modest balance of just ₹3,175. Despite the limited funds and the absence of margin or collateral, his trading account was suddenly granted an unusually large exposure limit—nearly ₹40 crore—due to a technical malfunction in the system of Kotak Securities.

Dipesh Ghimire

·

24 Jan, 2026