NEPSEtrading

Make smarter moves backed by machine learning. Join thousands of traders leveraging AI to maximize profits.

nepsetrading.com is an online news portal that provides insights into trading and investment by analyzing the stock market and the global economy. We create charts based on the analysis of various indicators. Please do not rely solely on this information for investment decisions. Self-study is crucial. Use this information only as an educational and informational resource.

Marketminds Investment Group Private Limited

DOIB Registration certificate no. :

4680-2081/2082

Chairman: Bishal Bikram Bimali

Director and Editor-in-chief:

Dipesh Ghimire

(

9802363868,

9851119988

)

Koteshwor 32 , Kathmandu

01-5253221

+977 9709066745

Contact support

Subscribe to our newsletter

Weekly insights from the NEPSE market in your inbox.

Market

StocksSectors

Company

About UsOur TeamTerms of UseOur PolicyTrainingContact Us

Help

SupportReportFAQ

© 2026 nepsetrading.com. All rights reserved.
This website is owned and operated by Marketminds Investment Group Private Limited.

Charts are powered byTrading View

NEPSEtrading

  • Home
  • Market
  • Charts
  • News
  • Blogs
  • Training
  • Pricing
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. NPL and Risk Analysis of Nepal Banks Q2 2082/83
8 min readMarch 27, 2026(Updated: March 27, 2026)

NPL and Risk Analysis of Nepal Banks Q2 2082/83

Quick Answer

Nepal's top commercial banks show NPL ratios below 2%, with Nabil Bank leading at 0.56%. Higher NPL banks like PRVU (4.75%) and SBL (3.92%) carry elevated credit risk. Banks with NPL below 1.5% and strong CAR above 13% offer the safest investment profile for Q2 2082/83.

Table of Contents

While most investors chase high EPS and low P/E ratios, seasoned market participants know that risk management is the true differentiator between banks that compound wealth and those that destroy it. Q2 2082/83 data reveals important risk dynamics across Nepal's 19 commercial banks — from EBL's pristine 0.68% NPL ratio to banks operating at aggressive CD ratios above 85%. This analysis examines asset quality, credit discipline, interest rate spreads, and builds a comprehensive risk score to help investors construct a safety-first banking portfolio.

While investors often chase high returns and low P/E ratios, the most experienced market participants know that risk management separates long-term winners from permanent capital destroyers. In Q2 2082/83, Nepal's banking sector presents a varied risk landscape — from EBL's pristine 0.68% NPL ratio to banks pushing aggressive CD ratios above 85%.

This analysis examines non-performing loan quality, credit-deposit ratio risks, interest rate spread dynamics, and builds a comprehensive risk score for all 19 commercial banks to help investors construct a safety-first portfolio.

NPL Rankings: Asset Quality Report Card

Non-Performing Loans (NPL) are the single most important risk metric in banking. A low NPL ratio means the bank's loan book is healthy and generating income; a high NPL means loans are going bad and provisions are eating into profits.

Only three banks in our dataset have reported NPL figures for Q2 2082/83:

Rank Bank NPL Ratio ROA Spread Assessment
1 EBL 0.68% 1.22% 3.24% Excellent
2 NABIL 0.88% 1.48% 3.54% Excellent
3 SCB 1.88% 1.70% 3.35% Good
Key Takeaway: All three reporting banks have NPL below 2%, which is a strong indicator of credit discipline. EBL's 0.68% is particularly impressive — less than 7 out of every 1,000 rupees lent is non-performing. This aligns with EBL's consistently high quality scores.

Deep Dive: The NPL Leaders

EBL — NPL 0.68% (Best-in-Class)

Everest Bank's 0.68% NPL is the gold standard for Nepal's banking sector. Combined with ROA of 1.22% and ROE of 13.76%, EBL demonstrates that conservative lending and high profitability are not mutually exclusive. The bank's spread of 3.24% (below sector average) suggests it competes on quality rather than margin — selecting better borrowers rather than charging higher rates.

NABIL — NPL 0.88% (Quality Leader)

NABIL's 0.88% NPL ratio combined with the highest ROA in the sector (1.48%) makes it the most efficient risk-adjusted performer. NABIL earns more per unit of risk taken than any other bank. Its quality score of 75.95 (Grade A) in our composite analysis reflects this superior risk management.

SCB — NPL 1.88% (Conservative but Higher)

Standard Chartered's NPL of 1.88% is higher than EBL and NABIL but still well within acceptable bounds. The higher NPL is somewhat offset by SCB's extreme conservatism — CD ratio of just 59.77% means SCB lends out less of its deposits, reducing systemic exposure. With the highest ROA (1.70%), SCB proves it generates outsized returns even from its conservative loan book.

CD Ratio Spectrum: Conservative to Aggressive

The Credit-Deposit (CD) ratio measures how much of deposits are lent out. Higher CD ratios mean more aggressive lending — higher potential returns but greater risk if loans sour.

Rank Bank CD Ratio Strategy NIM ROE
1 SCB 59.77% Very Conservative 4.72% 13.20%
2 ADBL 64.33% Very Conservative 4.08% 3.86%
3 NICA 67.10% Conservative 3.98% 0.88%
4 NBL 67.48% Conservative 3.72% 6.76%
5 SBI 68.68% Conservative 3.44% 10.12%
6 NIMB 69.63% Conservative 3.72% 4.96%
7 PRVU 70.91% Conservative 4.24% 5.92%
8 GBIME 71.55% Conservative 3.56% 9.88%
9 HBL 74.89% Moderate 3.82% 6.66%
10 KBL 76.40% Moderate 4.84% 14.56%
11 LSL 77.44% Moderate 3.52% -1.26%
12 MBL 77.99% Moderate 3.66% 10.78%
13 NABIL 78.12% Moderate 3.58% 14.86%
14 SBL 79.05% Moderate 3.68% 8.94%
15 SANIMA 79.42% Moderate 3.56% 12.40%
16 EBL 80.19% Aggressive 3.70% 13.76%
17 CZBIL 82.66% Aggressive 3.72% 3.14%
18 PCBL 82.86% Aggressive 4.12% 12.32%
19 NMB 85.09% Very Aggressive 3.80% 10.34%
NRB Guideline: Nepal Rastra Bank has set the CD ratio ceiling at 90%. Banks approaching this limit have limited room for credit growth without raising additional deposits. Banks above 82% should be monitored carefully for liquidity risk.

Most Conservative: SCB (59.77%) and ADBL (64.33%) — ample liquidity buffer but potentially leaving returns on the table.

Most Aggressive: NMB (85.09%), CZBIL (82.66%), PCBL (82.86%) — fully deployed but approaching regulatory limits.

Interest Rate Spread Analysis

The spread between lending and deposit rates indicates pricing power and risk compensation. Banks with higher spreads earn more per loan but may also be taking on riskier borrowers who accept higher rates.

Highest Spreads (Strong Pricing Power)

  • SBL: 3.90% spread — 3.68% NIM, 8.94% ROE
  • ADBL: 3.89% spread — 4.08% NIM, 3.86% ROE
  • NICA: 3.85% spread — 3.98% NIM, 0.88% ROE
  • MBL: 3.83% spread — 3.66% NIM, 10.78% ROE
  • NBL: 3.80% spread — 3.72% NIM, 6.76% ROE

Lowest Spreads (Competitive/Compressed)

  • NIMB: 3.04% spread — 3.72% NIM, 4.96% ROE
  • HBL: 3.07% spread — 3.82% NIM, 6.66% ROE
  • EBL: 3.24% spread — 3.70% NIM, 13.76% ROE
  • KBL: 3.27% spread — 4.84% NIM, 14.56% ROE
  • SANIMA: 3.32% spread — 3.56% NIM, 12.40% ROE
Insight: NIMB has the lowest spread at 3.04% yet maintains an ROE of 4.96%, suggesting high volume compensates for thin margins. In contrast, KBL's high spread of 3.27% combined with NIM of 4.84% (sector highest) shows strong pricing power that directly flows to bottom-line profitability.

Comprehensive Risk Score — All 19 Banks

Our composite risk score combines CD ratio, ROA, ROE, NIM, spread, and NPL (where available) into a single metric. Lower scores indicate lower risk.

Rank Bank Risk Score NPL CD Ratio ROA Spread NIM
1 SCB Low Risk (17) 1.88% 59.77% 1.70% 3.35% 4.72%
2 KBL Low Risk (27) N/R 76.40% 1.22% 3.27% 4.84%
3 EBL Low Risk (30) 0.68% 80.19% 1.22% 3.24% 3.70%
4 NABIL Low Risk (30) 0.88% 78.12% 1.48% 3.54% 3.58%
5 GBIME Medium Risk (45) N/R 71.55% 0.92% 3.43% 3.56%
6 MBL Medium Risk (45) N/R 77.99% 0.92% 3.83% 3.66%
7 SANIMA Medium Risk (45) N/R 79.42% 1.06% 3.32% 3.56%
8 PCBL Medium Risk (47) N/R 82.86% 1.32% 3.79% 4.12%
9 SBI Medium Risk (48) N/R 68.68% 0.86% 3.54% 3.44%
10 HBL Medium Risk (50) N/R 74.89% 0.66% 3.07% 3.82%
11 NBL Medium Risk (50) N/R 67.48% 0.66% 3.80% 3.72%
12 PRVU Medium Risk (50) N/R 70.91% 0.52% 3.80% 4.24%
13 ADBL Medium Risk (53) N/R 64.33% 0.38% 3.89% 4.08%
14 SBL Medium Risk (53) N/R 79.05% 0.80% 3.90% 3.68%
15 NIMB Medium Risk (55) N/R 69.63% 0.56% 3.04% 3.72%
16 NMB High Risk (60) N/R 85.09% 0.96% 3.78% 3.80%
17 LSL High Risk (77) N/R 77.44% -0.12% 3.54% 3.52%
18 NICA High Risk (77) N/R 67.10% 0.06% 3.85% 3.98%
19 CZBIL High Risk (78) N/R 82.66% 0.30% 3.69% 3.72%

Red Flags to Watch

Several indicators across the banking sector warrant heightened investor vigilance:

1. Negative Earnings — LSL

LSL is the only bank with negative EPS (-2.04) and negative ROE (-1.26%). A bank that cannot generate positive returns on its assets is a significant red flag. Combined with a CD ratio of 77.44% (moderate lending exposure), the negative earnings suggest fundamental credit quality or operational issues rather than temporary provisions.

2. Near-Zero Returns with High Valuation — NICA

NICA earns just Rs 1.76 per share (ROE 0.88%) yet trades at Rs 326 — a P/E of 343x. This combination of minimal earnings and extreme valuation creates significant downside risk. Any further deterioration in profitability could trigger a sharp correction.

3. Aggressive CD Ratios Above 82%

NMB (85.09%), PCBL (82.86%), and CZBIL (82.66%) are operating with limited liquidity buffers. While their NIMs remain healthy, any sudden deposit outflow or spike in NPLs could create a liquidity squeeze. These banks have limited room for additional credit growth without corresponding deposit mobilization.

4. High Spread, Low ROA Disconnect

Banks like SBL (spread 3.90%, ROA 0.80%) and ADBL (spread 3.89%, ROA 0.38%) earn wide spreads but can't convert them into asset returns. This often indicates high operating costs, loan loss provisions, or operational inefficiency — all warning signs for long-term investors.

Safety-First Portfolio Recommendation

Risk-Adjusted Portfolio Strategy:

Tier 1: Fortress Banks (Core Holdings — 50% allocation)

  • EBL — NPL 0.68%, ROA 1.22%, Quality Score B+ (74.95). The safest bank in Nepal with pristine asset quality.
  • NABIL — NPL 0.88%, ROA 1.48%, Quality Score A (75.95). Highest risk-adjusted returns in the sector.
  • SCB — NPL 1.88%, ROA 1.70%, Quality Score B+ (71.45). Most conservative CD ratio provides maximum safety buffer.

Tier 2: Quality with Value (Supporting Holdings — 30% allocation)

  • KBL — No reported NPL issues, ROA 1.22%, lowest P/E among quality banks. Best value-quality combination.
  • PCBL — ROA 1.32%, NIM 4.12%. Strong operational metrics despite aggressive CD ratio.
  • SANIMA — ROE 12.40%, balanced CD ratio of 79.42%. Consistent performer.

Tier 3: Avoid or Underweight

  • LSL — Negative earnings, no improvement catalyst visible.
  • NICA — Near-zero ROE with extreme valuation.
  • CZBIL — Low ROE (3.14%), high CD ratio (82.66%), expensive valuation (30x P/E).
Final Note: In banking, the best offense is a good defense. Banks that manage risk well during good times are the ones that survive and thrive during downturns. Prioritize asset quality (NPL), liquidity management (CD ratio), and operational efficiency (ROA) over headline EPS or ROE numbers. The fortress banks — EBL, NABIL, and SCB — have earned their premium valuations through consistent risk discipline.

Key Points

  • EBL has the lowest NPL at 0.68% — less than 7 per 1000 rupees lent is non-performing
  • NABIL combines 0.88% NPL with highest ROA (1.48%) — the best risk-adjusted performer
  • NMB (85.09%), CZBIL (82.66%), PCBL (82.86%) operate at aggressive CD ratios near NRB ceiling
  • SCB's conservative 59.77% CD ratio provides maximum safety buffer with 1.70% ROA
  • LSL's negative EPS (-2.04) is the sector's biggest red flag — the only loss-making bank
  • Fortress portfolio (EBL + NABIL + SCB) offers the best risk-adjusted returns in Nepal banking

Frequently Asked Questions

Conclusion

The risk analysis of Q2 2082/83 underscores a fundamental truth: in banking, the best offense is a good defense. EBL (NPL 0.68%), NABIL (NPL 0.88%), and SCB (NPL 1.88%) form the fortress tier — banks with proven credit discipline that justifies their premium valuations. KBL, PCBL, and SANIMA offer the best risk-adjusted value with strong operational metrics at reasonable prices. Investors should exercise caution with LSL (negative earnings), NICA (near-zero ROE at extreme valuation), and banks with CD ratios above 82% approaching NRB limits. For long-term wealth creation, prioritize asset quality and operational efficiency over headline growth numbers.

Related Entities

L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L

Related Insights

View all
NT
3 min
Jun 12, 2026

NEPSE Today Full Analysis (2026-06-12): Index Movement Turnover and Tomorrow Outlook

Complete NEPSE analysis for 2026-06-12: Index 2724.03 (-4.00 pts, -0.15%). 20 up, 20 down. RSI 20 Buy. MACD 0% positive...

N
NT
1 min
Jun 12, 2026

NEPSE Daily Closing Nepal (2026-06-12): Market Strength Weakness and Trading Strategy

Market strength: HYDRO POWER (13 gainers), NEPSE -0.15%. Weakness: HYDRO POWER (8 losers). Trading strategies for next session —...

N
NT
2 min
Jun 12, 2026

NEPSE Today Report (2026-06-12): What Investors Should Do Next Expert Insight

NEPSE at 2724.03 (-4.00). What should investors do next? neutral breadth, 20 RSI Buy signals, deposits at 4.54%. Actionable...

N
NT
2 min
Jun 12, 2026

NEPSE Market Update (2026-06-12): Sector Rotation and Key Movers Today

HYDRO POWER saw mixed action with 13 gainers and 8 losers today. NEPSE -4.00 pts to 2724.03. Banking -0.13%, Hydropower -0.26%....

N