Chaos in the Name of Violence: A Question Mark on the Nation’s Future

The violent protests that erupted in Kathmandu Valley on Friday have plunged the nation into a deep crisis. Demonstrators, rallying under the banner of restoring the monarchy, caused widespread destruction of private property, businesses, and media houses, inflicting billions of rupees in damage to the national economy. Led by Durga Prasai, the unrest claimed two lives and injured seven others. This incident raises serious questions about the core values of democracy and the safety of citizens.

In a democracy, the right to protest and express dissent is fundamental. However, using this right as a pretext for violence and anarchy is utterly unacceptable. In areas like Tinkune, Koteshwor, Baneshwor, and Balkumari, protesters breached police barricades, set vehicles ablaze, looted the Bhathbateni Super Store, and even attempted to attack media offices. Such destructive actions undermine the essence of peaceful protest. When Durga Prasai’s vehicle broke through police lines, it appeared to fuel the crowd’s aggression further. Whether this was a premeditated act of chaos or a spontaneous escalation, a thorough investigation must clarify.

Nepal’s economy, already fragile, has taken a severe hit. According to the National Statistics Office, the country’s GDP exceeds 5.7 trillion rupees, with a single day of shutdown or protest typically costing 3 to 4 billion rupees. Preliminary estimates suggest Friday’s violence caused far greater losses. The vandalism and arson targeting Bhathbateni, the Herbs Production Company, and countless private properties highlight the government’s failure to ensure security. This not only dents investor confidence but also shrinks job opportunities and exacerbates poverty. Beyond immediate losses, this unrest risks triggering long-term economic instability.

Durga Prasai’s track record is far from unblemished. His campaign of spreading misinformation about banks and encouraging loan defaults has long strained the financial sector. This violent protest under his leadership casts further doubt on his motives. Advocating for the monarchy is his prerogative, but resorting to violence weakens his cause. Public support must be won through peaceful dialogue and reason, not stones and fire.

The government’s lack of preparedness and sluggish response exacerbated this crisis. Signs of the impending protest were evident, yet preventive measures fell short. The state must now act decisively—punishing the guilty and devising a robust plan to prevent such incidents in the future. Protecting citizens’ lives and property is the government’s foremost duty.

This episode forces us into deep introspection. Violence is not a solution; it is the seed of new crises. All stakeholders must exercise restraint and choose the path of dialogue. Failure to do so will only darken the nation’s future. The wounds of this day—both human and economic—serve as a stark reminder: progress lies in unity and peace, not in destruction.