
The real test, then, is maturity rather than momentum. By Visa's own yardstick, the market will have come of age when consumers transact digitally with full confidence, businesses accept payments without friction, and the system's records start translating into credit, formalization and deeper participation in the economy. If Nepal gets that right, the company argues, the payoff will reach well beyond the financial sector — stronger businesses, wider access and an economy more firmly connected to the world. The direction is promising; the hard part is the plumbing, and the trust.

Global payments giant Visa is framing Nepal as a long-term strategic market, arguing that the country's payments landscape is entering a decisive new phase — one that will be defined less by how many people adopt digital payments than by how confidently they use them in daily economic life. The assessment comes in a commentary published by the company outlining its view of Nepal's digital transition and its own role in it.
Cash, Visa notes, has long sat at the center of how Nepal's economy runs — shaping how businesses operate, how trust is built in the marketplace, and how much of the economy stays informal. That equation, the company argues, is now shifting. As mobile banking, cards, wallets and other electronic transactions become routine for households and businesses — and spread well beyond the cities — the economy is becoming more transparent, more networked and more credible. Businesses, it says, are seeing the gains most clearly in efficiency, transparency and day-to-day operations, while coordination among regulators, financial institutions and innovators has given the shift added momentum.
The economic logic behind that claim is worth unpacking. Every digital transaction leaves a record that a cash payment does not. In an economy where a substantial share of activity happens informally, those records are the raw material of formalization: they widen the visible tax base, make business performance measurable, and create the data on which credit decisions can rest. In other words, the payments shift Visa describes is not merely a convenience story — it is a route by which more of Nepal's economy becomes legible to its financial system.
Notably, the company tempers its own optimism. The market, it concedes, is still at an early stage: cash continues to dominate daily life, many businesses are not yet fully equipped to accept digital payments, and consumer confidence in electronic transactions is still being built. The next step, in Visa's telling, is not simply wider usage but a system that works better for everyone — trusted, broadly accepted and capable of supporting larger economic activity.
A second strand of the argument concerns Nepal's deepening global ties. With large numbers of Nepalis working, studying and living abroad while staying financially connected to home, tourism bringing the world in, and businesses and IT professionals plugging into international trade and services, Visa contends that a payments system that works only locally is no longer enough — it must connect seamlessly with the rest of the world. The interpretation is hard to argue with: in an economy where remittance inflows underpin household consumption — a dependence Nepal Rastra Bank itself has repeatedly flagged — the rails that move money across borders are not a convenience but core economic infrastructure.
The commentary's most consequential point may be about small and medium enterprises. Many capable SMEs, Visa observes, struggle to obtain credit because they cannot demonstrate steady cash flow or document their business discipline in a form lenders can assess. A robust digital payments environment, it argues, can change that by creating clear records of economic activity, enabling better risk assessment and improving access to finance. Read closely, this is a case for moving Nepali lending away from its heavy reliance on collateral and toward cash-flow-based credit — arguably the single biggest prize of payment digitization for the real economy.
On its own role, Visa is keen to stress that it is now far more than a card brand. Operating across more than 200 countries and territories, it describes itself as a connector of consumers, merchants, banks, businesses and public institutions, and positions itself as a bridge between Nepal's domestic payments ecosystem and the global market. Tools such as Visa Direct, which enables fast and secure transfers into bank accounts, are pitched as directly relevant to Nepal's remittance and business-payment flows.
The company's commitment has already taken concrete form. Visa opened an office in Kathmandu and appointed Manoj Thapa — previously head of partnerships and innovation at domestic payments network Fonepay — as its Head of Nepal, signaling that its talk of a "long-term commitment" is backed by an on-the-ground presence rather than remote servicing.
Visa is careful, too, to frame the road ahead as a collective effort: banks, financial institutions, fintechs and domestic payment networks working together to grow acceptance, improve interoperability and strengthen trust, with Visa contributing global expertise and local focus. That framing matters, because Nepal already has dense home-grown payment rails of its own. The open question for the next chapter — one Visa itself names — is interoperability: how smoothly global networks and domestic systems mesh, so that users move money without worrying about which rail carries it.
The real test, then, is maturity rather than momentum. By Visa's own yardstick, the market will have come of age when consumers transact digitally with full confidence, businesses accept payments without friction, and the system's records start translating into credit, formalization and deeper participation in the economy. If Nepal gets that right, the company argues, the payoff will reach well beyond the financial sector — stronger businesses, wider access and an economy more firmly connected to the world. The direction is promising; the hard part is the plumbing, and the trust.
Written by
Dipesh Ghimire

5 min read
Up to Rs 20 lakh: 20% customs + 2.5% infrastructure fee Rs 20-30 lakh: 20% customs + 20% infrastructure fee Rs 30-40 lakh: 20% customs + 35% infrastructure fee Rs 40-50 lakh: 20% customs + 90% infrastructure fee Above Rs 50 lakh: 20% customs + 130% infrastructure fee
Dipesh Ghimire
·2 Jun, 2026

4 min read
Taken together, the project is being viewed as an important milestone in the development of Nepal's transmission infrastructure — both for the precedent it sets in private participation and for the role it could play in turning the far-west into a genuine power-generating region rather than one whose rivers run untapped.
Dipesh Ghimire
·2 Jun, 2026