#NepalBanking #LiquidityManage
·

By Sandeep Chaudhary

Deposits vs Loans – Which Banks Are Managing Liquidity Well?

Deposits vs Loans – Which Banks Are Managing Liquidity Well?

Managing liquidity is at the heart of banking stability, and the balance between deposits and loans shows how efficiently banks deploy their resources while keeping buffers for risk. As of mid-July 2025 (Asadh end 2082), the entire Nepali commercial banking sector holds Rs. 6.54 trillion in deposits against Rs. 4.96 trillion in loans, resulting in a sector-wide CD ratio of 76.63%. This figure suggests that banks are lending around three-fourths of their deposits, a moderate but watchful level. However, individual banks show significant variation, reflecting different risk appetites and business models.

The state-owned banks—Rastriya Banijya Bank (RBB), Nepal Bank Limited (NBL), and Agriculture Development Bank (ADBL)—are clearly more conservative in their liquidity management. RBB maintains the lowest CD ratio at 62.27%, while NBL (71.10%) and ADBL (72.82%) also stay on the safer side. Their strategy emphasizes financial resilience over profitability, ensuring large liquidity buffers for deposit withdrawals or market shocks. Similarly, Standard Chartered Bank Nepal, with a CD ratio of just 70.50%, and the highest net liquidity at 46.33%, demonstrates a highly cautious approach that prioritizes stability above aggressive loan growth.

By contrast, private banks dominate the high CD ratio group, reflecting aggressive lending practices. Citizens Bank International (84.45%), NMB Bank (84.31%), and Prime Commercial Bank (83.37%) are the most aggressive lenders, deploying over four-fifths of their deposits into loans. While such strategies maximize interest income, they also increase liquidity risk if deposits decline. Other big names like Nabil Bank (82.48%), Himalayan Bank (81.34%), and Sanima Bank (81.03%) also run on leaner liquidity buffers, signaling confidence in their ability to retain deposit flows.

Meanwhile, mid-range banks such as Global IME (76.06%), NIC Asia (76.72%), and Everest Bank (77.44%) strike a more balanced approach, operating near the sector average. These banks aim to maintain profitability through lending while keeping reasonable liquidity cushions.

Related Blogs

Deposits vs Loans – Which Banks Are Managing Liquidity Well?
#NepalBanking #LiquidityManage

1 min read

Deposits vs Loans – Which Banks Are Managing Liquidity Well?

The analysis highlights a dual trend in Nepal’s banking sector: state-owned banks prioritize liquidity security with lower CD ratios, while private banks aggressively expand loans with higher ratios. The sector-wide average of 76.63% reflects moderate lending activity, but the sharp contrast between conservative public banks and profit-driven private banks underscores differing strategies. Overall, the system remains stable, though high CD ratios in private banks signal potential stress points if deposit growth slows.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

CD Ratio Trends in Nepali Banking Sector – Asadh 2082
#NepalBanking #CDRatio #Liquid

1 min read

CD Ratio Trends in Nepali Banking Sector – Asadh 2082

The CD ratio trend in Asadh 2082 shows private banks leading with higher loan-to-deposit activity, while state-owned banks remain conservative with much lower ratios. The sector average of 76.63% indicates a moderately aggressive lending stance overall. Banks like Citizens, NMB, and Prime are more aggressive in loan mobilization, whereas RBB, NBL, and ADBL preserve stronger liquidity cushions. This divergence highlights a dual banking strategy in Nepal—profit-driven private banks vs stability-oriented state banks.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Which Bank Has the Best Liquidity Position in Nepal?
#NepalBanking #LiquidityStreng

1 min read

Which Bank Has the Best Liquidity Position in Nepal?

The analysis clearly shows that Standard Chartered Bank Nepal holds the best liquidity position among all commercial banks in Nepal, followed closely by state-owned banks like RBB, Nepal Bank, and ADBL. This strong liquidity profile provides them with higher resilience against deposit withdrawals and market shocks, ensuring financial stability. In contrast, some private banks maintain leaner liquidity buffers, balancing between profitability and prudence.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Are Nepali Banks Well-Capitalized? Mid-July 2025 Data Insights
#NepalBanking #CapitalAdequacy

1 min read

Are Nepali Banks Well-Capitalized? Mid-July 2025 Data Insights

Yes, Nepali banks are broadly well-capitalized, with the sector’s CAR (12.78%) and CCAR (10.03%) exceeding regulatory thresholds. Strong banks like Standard Chartered, Prabhu, NIMB, NIC Asia, and ADBL provide leadership in solvency, while some institutions remain closer to the minimum buffer. State-owned banks remain stable but modest in capital strength compared to private leaders. However, rising NPLs and shrinking spreads underline the need for cautious risk management to ensure that capitalization remains strong in the face of future challenges.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Top Banks by Total Capital Fund in Nepal 2025
#NepalBanking #TotalCapitalFun

1 min read

Top Banks by Total Capital Fund in Nepal 2025

In mid-July 2025, Global IME Bank, Nepal Investment Mega Bank, and Nabil Bank are the top three commercial banks in Nepal by Total Capital Fund, each exceeding Rs. 64 billion. Other strong players include Laxmi Sunrise, Kumari, and Prabhu Bank, while Standard Chartered and Nepal SBI rank lower in absolute terms but maintain solid solvency through high CARs. Overall, the data shows that capital concentration remains high in a handful of large banks, making them the backbone of Nepal’s financial stability.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Why CCAR Matters for Investors: NRB Report Explained
#NepalBanking #CCAR #CapitalAd

2 min read

Why CCAR Matters for Investors: NRB Report Explained

The CCAR of 10.03% in Nepal’s banking sector shows that banks are adequately capitalized, but the equity margin is thinner than the overall CAR of 12.78%. High-CCAR banks like Standard Chartered and NIMB offer stronger equity cushions, while banks like RBB and Himalayan Bank remain closer to the minimum. For investors, CCAR matters more than CAR because it represents the core equity available to absorb real losses, making it a key measure of long-term financial resilience and market confidence.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Nepal Bank, RBB, ADBL vs Private Banks: Capital Buffer Analysis 2082
#NepalBanking #CapitalBuffer #

1 min read

Nepal Bank, RBB, ADBL vs Private Banks: Capital Buffer Analysis 2082

In mid-July 2025, Nepal Bank, RBB, and ADBL collectively maintain a stable CAR of 12.70%, but their capital buffers remain modest compared to private-sector peers. Private banks not only dominate in absolute capital volume but also include leaders like Standard Chartered, Prabhu, NIMB, and NIC Asia with significantly higher CARs. However, private banks also carry greater lending risks due to high CD ratios. Overall, state banks continue to provide systemic stability through conservative practices, while private banks drive growth with stronger—but uneven—capital positions.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Which Banks Have the Highest Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) in Nepal?
#NepalBanking #CapitalAdequacy

1 min read

Which Banks Have the Highest Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) in Nepal?

Nepali commercial banks in mid-July 2025 remain adequately capitalized, with a sector-wide CAR of 12.78%. Standard Chartered Bank Nepal leads with 17.82%, followed by Prabhu Bank, Nepal Investment Mega Bank, NIC Asia, and Agriculture Development Bank, which all maintain strong capital cushions. Larger private and state-owned banks hover around the average, while some smaller players show tighter capital positions. While solvency remains sound, banks face pressure from rising NPLs, tighter spreads, and high credit-to-deposit ratios, underlining the importance of prudent capital and risk management.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Core Capital Strength of Nepali Commercial Banks in Mid-July 2025
#NepalBanking #CoreCapital #Co

2 min read

Core Capital Strength of Nepali Commercial Banks in Mid-July 2025

Nepali commercial banks in mid-July 2025 collectively hold Rs. 600 billion in core capital and maintain a sector-wide CAR of 12.78%, well above regulatory norms. Large banks such as Global IME, Nabil, and NIMB lead in capital strength, while state-owned banks provide systemic stability. Mid-tier and smaller banks maintain solid liquidity and efficiency but face profitability pressures. The sector remains resilient but cautious, with rising NPLs, tighter spreads, and high CD ratios highlighting areas that need close monitoring.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

How Rising Debt/GDP Ratio Shapes Nepal’s Economic Future
#NepalEconomy #PublicDebt #Deb

2 min read

How Rising Debt/GDP Ratio Shapes Nepal’s Economic Future

Nepal’s debt-to-GDP ratio has climbed to 43–44% in FY 2024/25, reflecting growing reliance on borrowing to finance fiscal gaps. While still manageable, rising debt raises concerns about fiscal sustainability, external vulnerability, and weak capital spending. Nepal’s future depends on channeling debt into high-return projects; otherwise, it risks falling into a debt-dependence cycle.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025