#NepalBanking #CapitalBuffer #
·

By Sandeep Chaudhary

Nepal Bank, RBB, ADBL vs Private Banks: Capital Buffer Analysis 2082

Nepal Bank, RBB, ADBL vs Private Banks: Capital Buffer Analysis 2082

The financial indicators published by Nepal Rastra Bank for Asadh end 2082 (Mid-July 2025) show how the capital buffers of Nepal’s three state-owned commercial banks—Nepal Bank Limited (NBL), Rastriya Banijya Bank (RBB), and Agriculture Development Bank Limited (ADBL)—compare with their private-sector counterparts. Together, the three state banks hold Rs. 87.35 billion in core capital and Rs. 106.17 billion in total capital fund, with an average Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) of 12.70% and Core Capital Adequacy Ratio (CCAR) of 10.45%. This means they are comfortably above the regulatory minimum, but the buffer they maintain is relatively modest compared to the strongest private banks. Among them, ADBL (13.36% CAR) stands slightly stronger, while Nepal Bank (13.06%) and RBB (11.84%) maintain thinner cushions.

On the other hand, the private commercial banks collectively dominate the sector in both size and capital strength. They hold over Rs. 512.65 billion in core capital and Rs. 658.5 billion in total capital fund, almost six times larger than the three state banks combined. Their aggregate CAR of 12.80% and CCAR of 9.96% closely matches the state banks in ratio terms, but the absolute volume of their capital provides greater resilience. Several private banks demonstrate far stronger solvency positions than their state-owned peers—Standard Chartered Bank Nepal (CAR 17.82%), Prabhu Bank (13.90%), Nepal Investment Mega Bank (13.73%), and NIC Asia Bank (13.42%) are notable leaders. However, not all private banks enjoy this strength; some, such as Himalayan Bank (11.16%) and Prime Commercial Bank (11.74%), operate close to the regulatory threshold.

The comparison also highlights strategic differences in liquidity management. RBB, for instance, maintains a conservative Credit-to-Deposit (CD) ratio of just 62.27%, showing lower lending risk. By contrast, several private banks such as Citizens (84.45%) and NMB (84.31%) are far more aggressive in credit expansion, putting more pressure on their capital buffers despite stronger CARs. This underlines how private banks, while better capitalized in many cases, also take higher risks that could expose them to shocks if non-performing loans rise further.

Related Blogs

Deposits vs Loans – Which Banks Are Managing Liquidity Well?
#NepalBanking #LiquidityManage

1 min read

Deposits vs Loans – Which Banks Are Managing Liquidity Well?

The analysis highlights a dual trend in Nepal’s banking sector: state-owned banks prioritize liquidity security with lower CD ratios, while private banks aggressively expand loans with higher ratios. The sector-wide average of 76.63% reflects moderate lending activity, but the sharp contrast between conservative public banks and profit-driven private banks underscores differing strategies. Overall, the system remains stable, though high CD ratios in private banks signal potential stress points if deposit growth slows.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

CD Ratio Trends in Nepali Banking Sector – Asadh 2082
#NepalBanking #CDRatio #Liquid

1 min read

CD Ratio Trends in Nepali Banking Sector – Asadh 2082

The CD ratio trend in Asadh 2082 shows private banks leading with higher loan-to-deposit activity, while state-owned banks remain conservative with much lower ratios. The sector average of 76.63% indicates a moderately aggressive lending stance overall. Banks like Citizens, NMB, and Prime are more aggressive in loan mobilization, whereas RBB, NBL, and ADBL preserve stronger liquidity cushions. This divergence highlights a dual banking strategy in Nepal—profit-driven private banks vs stability-oriented state banks.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Which Bank Has the Best Liquidity Position in Nepal?
#NepalBanking #LiquidityStreng

1 min read

Which Bank Has the Best Liquidity Position in Nepal?

The analysis clearly shows that Standard Chartered Bank Nepal holds the best liquidity position among all commercial banks in Nepal, followed closely by state-owned banks like RBB, Nepal Bank, and ADBL. This strong liquidity profile provides them with higher resilience against deposit withdrawals and market shocks, ensuring financial stability. In contrast, some private banks maintain leaner liquidity buffers, balancing between profitability and prudence.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Are Nepali Banks Well-Capitalized? Mid-July 2025 Data Insights
#NepalBanking #CapitalAdequacy

1 min read

Are Nepali Banks Well-Capitalized? Mid-July 2025 Data Insights

Yes, Nepali banks are broadly well-capitalized, with the sector’s CAR (12.78%) and CCAR (10.03%) exceeding regulatory thresholds. Strong banks like Standard Chartered, Prabhu, NIMB, NIC Asia, and ADBL provide leadership in solvency, while some institutions remain closer to the minimum buffer. State-owned banks remain stable but modest in capital strength compared to private leaders. However, rising NPLs and shrinking spreads underline the need for cautious risk management to ensure that capitalization remains strong in the face of future challenges.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Top Banks by Total Capital Fund in Nepal 2025
#NepalBanking #TotalCapitalFun

1 min read

Top Banks by Total Capital Fund in Nepal 2025

In mid-July 2025, Global IME Bank, Nepal Investment Mega Bank, and Nabil Bank are the top three commercial banks in Nepal by Total Capital Fund, each exceeding Rs. 64 billion. Other strong players include Laxmi Sunrise, Kumari, and Prabhu Bank, while Standard Chartered and Nepal SBI rank lower in absolute terms but maintain solid solvency through high CARs. Overall, the data shows that capital concentration remains high in a handful of large banks, making them the backbone of Nepal’s financial stability.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Why CCAR Matters for Investors: NRB Report Explained
#NepalBanking #CCAR #CapitalAd

2 min read

Why CCAR Matters for Investors: NRB Report Explained

The CCAR of 10.03% in Nepal’s banking sector shows that banks are adequately capitalized, but the equity margin is thinner than the overall CAR of 12.78%. High-CCAR banks like Standard Chartered and NIMB offer stronger equity cushions, while banks like RBB and Himalayan Bank remain closer to the minimum. For investors, CCAR matters more than CAR because it represents the core equity available to absorb real losses, making it a key measure of long-term financial resilience and market confidence.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Nepal Bank, RBB, ADBL vs Private Banks: Capital Buffer Analysis 2082
#NepalBanking #CapitalBuffer #

1 min read

Nepal Bank, RBB, ADBL vs Private Banks: Capital Buffer Analysis 2082

In mid-July 2025, Nepal Bank, RBB, and ADBL collectively maintain a stable CAR of 12.70%, but their capital buffers remain modest compared to private-sector peers. Private banks not only dominate in absolute capital volume but also include leaders like Standard Chartered, Prabhu, NIMB, and NIC Asia with significantly higher CARs. However, private banks also carry greater lending risks due to high CD ratios. Overall, state banks continue to provide systemic stability through conservative practices, while private banks drive growth with stronger—but uneven—capital positions.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Which Banks Have the Highest Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) in Nepal?
#NepalBanking #CapitalAdequacy

1 min read

Which Banks Have the Highest Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) in Nepal?

Nepali commercial banks in mid-July 2025 remain adequately capitalized, with a sector-wide CAR of 12.78%. Standard Chartered Bank Nepal leads with 17.82%, followed by Prabhu Bank, Nepal Investment Mega Bank, NIC Asia, and Agriculture Development Bank, which all maintain strong capital cushions. Larger private and state-owned banks hover around the average, while some smaller players show tighter capital positions. While solvency remains sound, banks face pressure from rising NPLs, tighter spreads, and high credit-to-deposit ratios, underlining the importance of prudent capital and risk management.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

Core Capital Strength of Nepali Commercial Banks in Mid-July 2025
#NepalBanking #CoreCapital #Co

2 min read

Core Capital Strength of Nepali Commercial Banks in Mid-July 2025

Nepali commercial banks in mid-July 2025 collectively hold Rs. 600 billion in core capital and maintain a sector-wide CAR of 12.78%, well above regulatory norms. Large banks such as Global IME, Nabil, and NIMB lead in capital strength, while state-owned banks provide systemic stability. Mid-tier and smaller banks maintain solid liquidity and efficiency but face profitability pressures. The sector remains resilient but cautious, with rising NPLs, tighter spreads, and high CD ratios highlighting areas that need close monitoring.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025

How Rising Debt/GDP Ratio Shapes Nepal’s Economic Future
#NepalEconomy #PublicDebt #Deb

2 min read

How Rising Debt/GDP Ratio Shapes Nepal’s Economic Future

Nepal’s debt-to-GDP ratio has climbed to 43–44% in FY 2024/25, reflecting growing reliance on borrowing to finance fiscal gaps. While still manageable, rising debt raises concerns about fiscal sustainability, external vulnerability, and weak capital spending. Nepal’s future depends on channeling debt into high-return projects; otherwise, it risks falling into a debt-dependence cycle.

Sandeep Chaudhary

·

24 Sep, 2025